Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Metz Cubus 50TY65 UHD twin vs Walker WP4K50261
Walker WP4K50261 uses 61 kWh less a year: €17 a year at your price, €174 over ten years.
| Metz Cubus 50TY65 UHD twin | Walker WP4K50261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 114 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €32 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €323 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 5,468 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 78.0 W | 36.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 148.0 W | 66.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.2 W / 1.2 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Metz Cubus 50TY65 UHD twin is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →