Fossibot C17 SE
More durable than 19% of the 1,036 smartphones on the EU register, judged on battery life, charge cycles, drops, repairability and years of updates.
- Durability score
- 27 / 100
- Better than 19%
- Battery per charge
- 49 h
- Typical 3,408 min
- Repairability
- B
- Index 3.39 of 5
Below most comparable devices on durability: 27 out of 100, while the typical device reaches 38. 40% of comparable models reach a better class than B; the most common is A. Its strongest point is charge cycles; its weakest, against comparable devices, is drop resistance. FOSSiBOT has 22 models in this group; this one is number 19 among them. FOSSiBOT sells the same label values under other model names: S9. Registered in Sept 2026, one of the newer models in its group.
Where it stands
Rank 806 of 1,036 smartphones by durability score.
Next to it in the ranking
- Blackview WAVE 5C 27 /100
- Philips S8306 27 /100
- Fossibot C17 SE 27 /100
- Fossibot S9 27 /100
- iHunt Strong iHunt Max 27 /100
Durability profile
Battery per charge
Charge cycles to 80 %
Drops survived
Repairability index
Software updates
Label and product sheet
- Energy class
- B
- Battery endurance per full charge
- 48 h 34 min
- Battery lifespan
- 1,000 cycles to 80 %
- Battery capacity
- 5,000 mAh
- User-replaceable battery
- no
- Drop resistance
- C · 180 falls without defect
- Repairability
- B · index 3.39
- Software updates (minimum)
- 5 years
- Dust and water protection
- IP44
- Guarantee (supplier)
- 0.3 years
- Spare parts (minimum)
- 7 years
Model numbers and history
Registered by FOSSiBOT under one model number.
C17 SE
- First published in the EU register (EPREL)
- Placed on the EU market
Questions
How durable is the Fossibot C17 SE?
Its durability score is 27 out of 100: better than 19% of smartphones on the EU register.
How long will it get updates?
The supplier commits to at least 5 years of operating system updates after the model leaves the market.