EnergyLabelEU
EN
Costs for 0.283 €/kWh · Eurostat 2026 H1

Comparison · TVs & monitors

Samsung QE65QN92FAT vs Walker WP4K65261

Walker WP4K65261 uses 48 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €136 over ten years.

F Samsung QE65QN92FAT C Walker WP4K65261
Yearly consumption 130 kWh82 kWh
Cost per year €37€23
Cost over 10 years €368€232
Rank in its group 1,508 / 5,64225 / 5,642
Group TVs, 65″ and overTVs, 65″ and over
Energy class SDR / HDR F / G C / G
On-mode power SDR 89.0 W 56.0 W
On-mode power HDR 231.0 W 136.0 W
Standby / networked standby 0.5 W / 2.0 W 0.5 W / 2.0 W
Screen diagonal 65″ 65″
Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160
Panel QLED LCD LCD
Refresh rate 165 Hz 50 Hz
Software updates (minimum) 8 years 2 years
Guarantee (supplier) 2 years 0 years
Spare parts (minimum) 7 years 2 years

If Samsung QE65QN92FAT is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →