Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 65UG8026 vs Samsung TQ65S95HFT
Prosonic 65UG8026 uses 63 kWh less a year: €18 a year at your price, €178 over ten years.
| Prosonic 65UG8026 | Samsung TQ65S95HFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 82 kWh | 145 kWh |
| Cost per year | €23 | €41 |
| Cost over 10 years | €232 | €409 |
| Rank in its group | 25 / 5,642 | 1,894 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | F / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 56.0 W | 99.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 136.0 W | 315.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LCD | OLED |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 7 years |
If Samsung TQ65S95HFT is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →