Prosonic 65UG8026 vs Samsung TQ65S95FAT

Prosonic 65UG8026 uses 64 kWh less a year: €18 a year at your price, €182 over ten years.

	Prosonic 65UG8026	Samsung TQ65S95FAT
Yearly consumption	82 kWh	146 kWh
Cost per year	€23	€41
Cost over 10 years	€232	€413
Rank in its group	25 / 5,642	1,967 / 5,642
Group	TVs, 65″ and over	TVs, 65″ and over
Energy class SDR / HDR	C / G	F / G
On-mode power SDR	56.0 W	100.0 W
On-mode power HDR	136.0 W	315.0 W
Standby / networked standby	0.5 W / 2.0 W	0.5 W / 2.0 W
Screen diagonal	65″	65″
Resolution	3840×2160	3840×2160
Panel	LCD	OLED
Refresh rate	50 Hz	165 Hz
Software updates (minimum)	2 years	8 years
Guarantee (supplier)	0 years	2 years
Spare parts (minimum)	2 years	7 years

If Samsung TQ65S95FAT is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →