Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 65UG8026 vs Samsung QE65S90FAT
Prosonic 65UG8026 uses 48 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €136 over ten years.
| Prosonic 65UG8026 | Samsung QE65S90FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 82 kWh | 130 kWh |
| Cost per year | €23 | €37 |
| Cost over 10 years | €232 | €368 |
| Rank in its group | 25 / 5,642 | 1,508 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | F / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 56.0 W | 89.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 136.0 W | 204.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LCD | OLED |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 7 years |
If Samsung QE65S90FAT is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →