Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 65UAND8009 vs Walker WP4K65261
Walker WP4K65261 uses 77 kWh less a year: €22 a year at your price, €219 over ten years.
| Prosonic 65UAND8009 | Walker WP4K65261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 159 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Cost per year | €45 | €23 |
| Cost over 10 years | €451 | €232 |
| Rank in its group | 3,098 / 5,642 | 25 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 109.0 W | 56.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 109.0 W | 136.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 2 years |
If Prosonic 65UAND8009 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →