Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 65QUG9026 vs Tesla Q65E655GUS
Prosonic 65QUG9026 uses 26 kWh less a year: €7 a year at your price, €74 over ten years.
| Prosonic 65QUG9026 | Tesla Q65E655GUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 82 kWh | 108 kWh |
| Cost per year | €23 | €31 |
| Cost over 10 years | €232 | €306 |
| Rank in its group | 25 / 5,642 | 211 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | E / E |
| On-mode power SDR | 56.0 W | 74.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 136.0 W | 75.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 7 years |
If Tesla Q65E655GUS is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →