Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 65QUG9026 vs Samsung QE65LS03FAU
Prosonic 65QUG9026 uses 76 kWh less a year: €21 a year at your price, €215 over ten years.
| Prosonic 65QUG9026 | Samsung QE65LS03FAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 82 kWh | 158 kWh |
| Cost per year | €23 | €45 |
| Cost over 10 years | €232 | €447 |
| Rank in its group | 25 / 5,642 | 3,059 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | G / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 56.0 W | 108.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 136.0 W | 231.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 7 years |
If Samsung QE65LS03FAU is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →