Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 65QUG9026 vs Samsung GQ65QN90FAT
Prosonic 65QUG9026 uses 48 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €136 over ten years.
| Prosonic 65QUG9026 | Samsung GQ65QN90FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 82 kWh | 130 kWh |
| Cost per year | €23 | €37 |
| Cost over 10 years | €232 | €368 |
| Rank in its group | 25 / 5,642 | 1,508 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | F / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 56.0 W | 89.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 136.0 W | 231.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 7 years |
If Samsung GQ65QN90FAT is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →