Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 65QUG9026 vs Samsung GQ65QN900BT
Prosonic 65QUG9026 uses 340 kWh less a year: €96 a year at your price, €963 over ten years.
| Prosonic 65QUG9026 | Samsung GQ65QN900BT | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 82 kWh | 422 kWh |
| Cost per year | €23 | €119 |
| Cost over 10 years | €232 | €1,195 |
| Rank in its group | 25 / 5,642 | 5,619 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | G / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 56.0 W | 289.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 136.0 W | 435.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 7680×4320 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 7 years |
If Samsung GQ65QN900BT is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →