Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 55QUG9026 vs Sinotec 55X6500H
Prosonic 55QUG9026 uses 50 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €141 over ten years.
| Prosonic 55QUG9026 | Sinotec 55X6500H | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 61 kWh | 111 kWh |
| Cost per year | €17 | €31 |
| Cost over 10 years | €174 | €314 |
| Rank in its group | 1 / 3,514 | 1,605 / 3,514 |
| Group | TVs, 55–64″ | TVs, 55–64″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | F / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 42.0 W | 76.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 82.0 W | 92.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 0.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 55″ | 55″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | LED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 1 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
If Sinotec 55X6500H is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →