Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 50QUG9026 vs Walker WP4K50221BRD
Prosonic 50QUG9026 uses 51 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €145 over ten years.
| Prosonic 50QUG9026 | Walker WP4K50221BRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 53 kWh | 104 kWh |
| Cost per year | €15 | €29 |
| Cost over 10 years | €149 | €294 |
| Rank in its group | 53 / 5,712 | 4,998 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | G / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 36.0 W | 71.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 66.0 W | 98.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 2 years |
If Walker WP4K50221BRD is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →