Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 50QUG9026 vs Sharp 50JP7765E
Prosonic 50QUG9026 uses 23 kWh less a year: €7 a year at your price, €66 over ten years.
| Prosonic 50QUG9026 | Sharp 50JP7765E | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 53 kWh | 76 kWh |
| Cost per year | €15 | €21 |
| Cost over 10 years | €149 | €215 |
| Rank in its group | 53 / 5,712 | 2,140 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | E / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 36.0 W | 52.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 66.0 W | 154.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
If Sharp 50JP7765E is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →