Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Prosonic 50QUG9026 vs Samsung BE50FX-H
Prosonic 50QUG9026 uses 48 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €136 over ten years.
| Prosonic 50QUG9026 | Samsung BE50FX-H | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 53 kWh | 101 kWh |
| Cost per year | €15 | €29 |
| Cost over 10 years | €149 | €285 |
| Rank in its group | 53 / 5,712 | 4,848 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / G | G / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 36.0 W | 69.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 66.0 W | 112.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | LED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 0 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 7 years |
If Samsung BE50FX-H is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →