Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Procaster 50A900H vs Walker WP4K50261
Walker WP4K50261 uses 51 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €145 over ten years.
| Procaster 50A900H | Walker WP4K50261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 104 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €29 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €294 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 4,998 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 71.0 W | 36.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 71.0 W | 66.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.4 W / 0.6 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 49″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
| Software updates (minimum) | — | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | — | 0 years |
If Procaster 50A900H is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →