Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Polaroid P50URF1315U vs Walker WP4K50261
Walker WP4K50261 uses 39 kWh less a year: €11 a year at your price, €112 over ten years.
| Polaroid P50URF1315U | Walker WP4K50261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 92 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €26 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €261 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 3,886 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 63.0 W | 36.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 98.0 W | 66.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
If Polaroid P50URF1315U is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →