Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 70PUS8506/12 vs Sharp 4T-C70HPx
Sharp 4T-C70HPx uses 40 kWh less a year: €11 a year at your price, €112 over ten years.
| Philips 70PUS8506/12 | Sharp 4T-C70HPx | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 177 kWh | 137 kWh |
| Cost per year | €50 | €39 |
| Cost over 10 years | €500 | €389 |
| Rank in its group | 3,808 / 5,642 | 1,622 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | E / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 121.0 W | 94.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 186.0 W | 220.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.3 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 70″ | 70″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 8 years |
If Philips 70PUS8506/12 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →