Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 70PUS8108/12 vs Sharp 4T-C70HLx
Sharp 4T-C70HLx uses 22 kWh less a year: €6 a year at your price, €62 over ten years.
| Philips 70PUS8108/12 | Sharp 4T-C70HLx | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 156 kWh | 134 kWh |
| Cost per year | €44 | €38 |
| Cost over 10 years | €442 | €380 |
| Rank in its group | 2,804 / 5,642 | 1,583 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | E / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 107.0 W | 92.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 210.0 W | 160.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.3 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 70″ | 70″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 8 years |
If Philips 70PUS8108/12 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →