Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 65PUS8609/12 vs Prosonic 65QUG9026
Prosonic 65QUG9026 uses 66 kWh less a year: €19 a year at your price, €186 over ten years.
| Philips 65PUS8609/12 | Prosonic 65QUG9026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 148 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Cost per year | €42 | €23 |
| Cost over 10 years | €418 | €232 |
| Rank in its group | 2,100 / 5,642 | 25 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 101.0 W | 56.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 197.0 W | 136.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Philips 65PUS8609/12 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →