Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 65MLED910/62 vs Prosonic 65UG8026
Prosonic 65UG8026 uses 63 kWh less a year: €18 a year at your price, €178 over ten years.
| Philips 65MLED910/62 | Prosonic 65UG8026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 145 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Cost per year | €41 | €23 |
| Cost over 10 years | €409 | €232 |
| Rank in its group | 1,894 / 5,642 | 25 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 99.0 W | 56.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 249.0 W | 136.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | QLED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Philips 65MLED910/62 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →