Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 65HFL6014U/12 vs Prosonic 65QUG9026
Prosonic 65QUG9026 uses 72 kWh less a year: €20 a year at your price, €202 over ten years.
| Philips 65HFL6014U/12 | Prosonic 65QUG9026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 153 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Cost per year | €43 | €23 |
| Cost over 10 years | €434 | €232 |
| Rank in its group | 2,653 / 5,642 | 25 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / – | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 105.0 W | 56.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.3 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 3 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
| On-mode power HDR | — | 136.0 W |
If Philips 65HFL6014U/12 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →