Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 55PUS8949/62 vs Prosonic 55QUG9026
Prosonic 55QUG9026 uses 39 kWh less a year: €11 a year at your price, €112 over ten years.
| Philips 55PUS8949/62 | Prosonic 55QUG9026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 101 kWh | 61 kWh |
| Cost per year | €29 | €17 |
| Cost over 10 years | €285 | €174 |
| Rank in its group | 1,097 / 3,514 | 1 / 3,514 |
| Group | TVs, 55–64″ | TVs, 55–64″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 69.0 W | 42.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 180.0 W | 82.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 55″ | 55″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Philips 55PUS8949/62 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →