Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 55PUS8548/62 vs Prosonic 55UG8026
Prosonic 55UG8026 uses 51 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €145 over ten years.
| Philips 55PUS8548/62 | Prosonic 55UG8026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 112 kWh | 61 kWh |
| Cost per year | €32 | €17 |
| Cost over 10 years | €318 | €174 |
| Rank in its group | 1,800 / 3,514 | 1 / 3,514 |
| Group | TVs, 55–64″ | TVs, 55–64″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 77.0 W | 42.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 118.0 W | 82.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.3 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 55″ | 55″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Philips 55PUS8548/62 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →