Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 50PUS8837/12 vs Walker WP4K50261
Walker WP4K50261 uses 50 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €140 over ten years.
| Philips 50PUS8837/12 | Walker WP4K50261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 102 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €29 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €289 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 4,915 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 70.0 W | 36.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 128.0 W | 66.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.3 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Philips 50PUS8837/12 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →