Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 50PUS8309/12 vs Prosonic 50QUG9026
Prosonic 50QUG9026 uses 51 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €145 over ten years.
| Philips 50PUS8309/12 | Prosonic 50QUG9026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 104 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €29 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €294 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 4,998 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 71.0 W | 36.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 118.0 W | 66.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Philips 50PUS8309/12 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →