Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Philips 43HFL4025/12 vs Procaster 43A920H
Philips 43HFL4025/12 uses 35 kWh less a year: €10 a year at your price, €99 over ten years.
| Philips 43HFL4025/12 | Procaster 43A920H | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 44 kWh | 79 kWh |
| Cost per year | €12 | €22 |
| Cost over 10 years | €124 | €223 |
| Rank in its group | 5 / 5,712 | 2,397 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | D / F | G / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 30.0 W | 54.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 47.0 W | 54.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 43″ | 43″ |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | — |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | — |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 7 years |
If Procaster 43A920H is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →