Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Metz Aurus 65FA63 OLED twin vs Walker WP4K65261
Walker WP4K65261 uses 53 kWh less a year: €15 a year at your price, €149 over ten years.
| Metz Aurus 65FA63 OLED twin | Walker WP4K65261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 134 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Cost per year | €38 | €23 |
| Cost over 10 years | €380 | €232 |
| Rank in its group | 1,583 / 5,642 | 25 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | E / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 92.0 W | 56.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 126.0 W | 136.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.3 W / 1.2 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | OLED | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 100 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Metz Aurus 65FA63 OLED twin is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →