Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Metz Aurus 55TY88 OLED twin vs Walker WP4K55261
Walker WP4K55261 uses 64 kWh less a year: €18 a year at your price, €182 over ten years.
| Metz Aurus 55TY88 OLED twin | Walker WP4K55261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 126 kWh | 61 kWh |
| Cost per year | €36 | €17 |
| Cost over 10 years | €356 | €174 |
| Rank in its group | 3,080 / 3,514 | 1 / 3,514 |
| Group | TVs, 55–64″ | TVs, 55–64″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / F | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 86.0 W | 42.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 80.0 W | 82.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.2 W / 0.8 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 55″ | 55″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | OLED | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Metz Aurus 55TY88 OLED twin is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →