Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
LG 65NANO813QA vs Prosonic 65QUG9026
Prosonic 65QUG9026 uses 57 kWh less a year: €16 a year at your price, €161 over ten years.
| LG 65NANO813QA | Prosonic 65QUG9026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 139 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Cost per year | €39 | €23 |
| Cost over 10 years | €393 | €232 |
| Rank in its group | 1,647 / 5,642 | 25 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 94.9 W | 56.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 153.0 W | 136.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
If LG 65NANO813QA is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →