Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
KTC ZN27OL240 vs Philips 27B2G5200
Philips 27B2G5200 uses 40 kWh less a year: €11 a year at your price, €114 over ten years.
| KTC ZN27OL240 | Philips 27B2G5200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 50 kWh | 10 kWh |
| Cost per year | €14 | €3 |
| Cost over 10 years | €143 | €29 |
| Rank in its group | 4,762 / 4,819 | 13 / 4,819 |
| Group | Monitors, 24–31″ | Monitors, 24–31″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | A / – |
| On-mode power SDR | 34.5 W | 7.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 36.5 W | — |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.4 W | 0.3 W / 0.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 2560×1440 | 1920×1080 |
| Panel | OTHER | LED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 7 years |
| Software updates (minimum) | — | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | — | 3 years |
If KTC ZN27OL240 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →