Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Konka UDG50HK684ANTS vs Walker WP4K50261
Walker WP4K50261 uses 42 kWh less a year: €12 a year at your price, €120 over ten years.
| Konka UDG50HK684ANTS | Walker WP4K50261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 95 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €27 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €269 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 4,184 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 65.0 W | 36.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 97.0 W | 66.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Konka UDG50HK684ANTS is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →