Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Kodak WF238V vs Philips 24M2N3200AM
Kodak WF238V uses 21 kWh less a year: €6 a year at your price, €58 over ten years.
| Kodak WF238V | Philips 24M2N3200AM | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 6 kWh | 26 kWh |
| Cost per year | €2 | €7 |
| Cost over 10 years | €16 | €74 |
| Rank in its group | 1 / 4,819 | 1,399 / 4,819 |
| Group | Monitors, 24–31″ | Monitors, 24–31″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | B / – | E / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 4.0 W | 18.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 0.0 W | 0.5 W |
| Screen diagonal | 24″ | 24″ |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 | 1920×1080 |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 3 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 3 years | 3 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 2 years | 7 years |
| On-mode power HDR | — | 35.0 W |
If Philips 24M2N3200AM is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →