Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Hitachi 49HK5607 vs Prosonic 50QUG9026
Prosonic 50QUG9026 uses 48 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €136 over ten years.
| Hitachi 49HK5607 | Prosonic 50QUG9026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 101 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €29 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €285 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 4,848 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 69.0 W | 36.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 100.0 W | 66.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 49″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
| Software updates (minimum) | — | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | — | 0 years |
If Hitachi 49HK5607 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →