Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Haier H65M92FUX vs Samsung GQ65QN900AT
Haier H65M92FUX uses 301 kWh less a year: €85 a year at your price, €852 over ten years.
| Haier H65M92FUX | Samsung GQ65QN900AT | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 71 kWh | 372 kWh |
| Cost per year | €20 | €105 |
| Cost over 10 years | €202 | €1,054 |
| Rank in its group | 14 / 5,642 | 5,613 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / C | G / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 48.9 W | 255.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 55.7 W | 365.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 7680×4320 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 7 years |
If Samsung GQ65QN900AT is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →