Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Haier H65M92FUX vs Nabo 65 QL8700
Haier H65M92FUX uses 26 kWh less a year: €7 a year at your price, €75 over ten years.
| Haier H65M92FUX | Nabo 65 QL8700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 71 kWh | 98 kWh |
| Cost per year | €20 | €28 |
| Cost over 10 years | €202 | €277 |
| Rank in its group | 14 / 5,642 | 71 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | C / C | D / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 48.9 W | 67.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 55.7 W | 127.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 8 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Nabo 65 QL8700 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →