Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
FAR QL50EH264S vs Prosonic 50QUG9026
Prosonic 50QUG9026 uses 25 kWh less a year: €7 a year at your price, €70 over ten years.
| FAR QL50EH264S | Prosonic 50QUG9026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 77 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €22 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €219 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 2,223 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | E / E | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 53.0 W | 36.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 54.0 W | 66.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 2.0 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | QLED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If FAR QL50EH264S is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →