FAR QL50CH262S vs Walker WP4K50261

Walker WP4K50261 uses 51 kWh less a year: €14 a year at your price, €145 over ten years.

	FAR QL50CH262S	Walker WP4K50261
Yearly consumption	104 kWh	53 kWh
Cost per year	€29	€15
Cost over 10 years	€294	€149
Rank in its group	4,998 / 5,712	53 / 5,712
Group	TVs, 43–54″	TVs, 43–54″
Energy class SDR / HDR	G / G	C / G
On-mode power SDR	71.0 W	36.0 W
On-mode power HDR	71.0 W	66.0 W
Standby / networked standby	0.5 W / 1.5 W	0.5 W / 2.0 W
Screen diagonal	50″	50″
Resolution	3840×2160	3840×2160
Panel	QLED LCD	LCD
Refresh rate	60 Hz	50 Hz
Software updates (minimum)	8 years	2 years
Guarantee (supplier)	2 years	0 years
Spare parts (minimum)	7 years	2 years

If FAR QL50CH262S is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →