Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Cello COD65TZ vs Haier H65M92FUX
Haier H65M92FUX uses 92 kWh less a year: €26 a year at your price, €261 over ten years.
| Cello COD65TZ | Haier H65M92FUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 164 kWh | 71 kWh |
| Cost per year | €46 | €20 |
| Cost over 10 years | €463 | €202 |
| Rank in its group | 3,498 / 5,642 | 14 / 5,642 |
| Group | TVs, 65″ and over | TVs, 65″ and over |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | G / G | C / C |
| On-mode power SDR | 112.0 W | 48.9 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 112.0 W | 55.7 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.4 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 65″ | 65″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 8 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 1 years | 8 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 7 years |
If Cello COD65TZ is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →