Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Cello C5024WSF vs Walker WP4K50261
Walker WP4K50261 uses 33 kWh less a year: €9 a year at your price, €95 over ten years.
| Cello C5024WSF | Walker WP4K50261 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 86 kWh | 53 kWh |
| Cost per year | €24 | €15 |
| Cost over 10 years | €244 | €149 |
| Rank in its group | 3,687 / 5,712 | 53 / 5,712 |
| Group | TVs, 43–54″ | TVs, 43–54″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / – | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 59.0 W | 36.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.4 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 50″ | 50″ |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 50 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 1 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
| On-mode power HDR | — | 66.0 W |
If Cello C5024WSF is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →