Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
BenQ RD240Q vs Kodak WF238V
Kodak WF238V uses 27 kWh less a year: €8 a year at your price, €77 over ten years.
| BenQ RD240Q | Kodak WF238V | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 33 kWh | 6 kWh |
| Cost per year | €9 | €2 |
| Cost over 10 years | €93 | €16 |
| Rank in its group | 3,362 / 4,819 | 1 / 4,819 |
| Group | Monitors, 24–31″ | Monitors, 24–31″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / F | B / – |
| On-mode power SDR | 22.6 W | 4.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 22.6 W | — |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.4 W | 0.5 W / 0.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 24″ | 24″ |
| Resolution | 2560×1600 | 1920×1080 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 8 years | 3 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 2 years | 3 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If BenQ RD240Q is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →