Costs for 0.283 €/kWh
· Eurostat 2026 H1
Comparison · TVs & monitors
Antteq Q55-AGU1 vs Prosonic 55UG8026
Prosonic 55UG8026 uses 38 kWh less a year: €11 a year at your price, €108 over ten years.
| Antteq Q55-AGU1 | Prosonic 55UG8026 | |
|---|---|---|
| Yearly consumption | 99 kWh | 61 kWh |
| Cost per year | €28 | €17 |
| Cost over 10 years | €281 | €174 |
| Rank in its group | 1,081 / 3,514 | 1 / 3,514 |
| Group | TVs, 55–64″ | TVs, 55–64″ |
| Energy class SDR / HDR | F / G | C / G |
| On-mode power SDR | 68.0 W | 42.0 W |
| On-mode power HDR | 80.0 W | 82.0 W |
| Standby / networked standby | 0.5 W / 0.5 W | 0.5 W / 2.0 W |
| Screen diagonal | 55″ | 55″ |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | 3840×2160 |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Software updates (minimum) | 2 years | 2 years |
| Guarantee (supplier) | 1 years | 0 years |
| Spare parts (minimum) | 7 years | 2 years |
If Antteq Q55-AGU1 is cheaper to buy, the price gap is paid back by lower running costs only when it is smaller than the cost difference over the years you keep it. Work it out with your prices →